Send your message of solidarity!
Tweet

More journalists in danger for media supporting freedom in conservative countries

“The attack on the respected journalist Asos Hardi is the latest example of the grave risks faced by independent media workers in Iraqi Kurdistan,” said Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East director at Human Rights Watch.

Journalists in Kurdistan are the target of assaults related to their published material that focuses on rights and freedom, this article points out. 

The government can’t hide the blood on their hands from these attacks with Hardi expressing his concern that the investigation will go nowhere after alleged conspiracies involving the government security and their blatant discordance with the independent media owner’s angle of articles. Journalists have been beaten, threatened, harrassed and attacked. 

Yet the article reporting this attack promises that a relentless need to report news as a voice to the people suffering under repressive regimes remains in the journalism world, and will never die no matter how many innocent and idealistic reporters die in vain. 

http://www.hrw.org/news/2011/08/30/iraqi-kurdistan-prominent-kurdish-journalist-assaulted

Tweet

Heartbeat bill should be opposed for women’s liberation and rights

Legislatures are proposing and actively trying to put into action the heartbeat bill to limit abortions. In complete negligence of Roe vs. Wade, this proposition is completely unconstitutional and regresses and retracts from so many of the challenges women have overcome in recent years to become equal. Without sexual liberty and freedom, including abortions, women will forever be placed below the thrones of men in rights and freedoms. Oppose bill HB125. 

If you live in Ohio, please visit: 

http://www.house.state.oh.us/

Find your congressman or congresswoman and declare that the heartbeat bill is unconstitutional and to not support it. The upsurge of antiabortion legislation in recent news is more than upsetting for me and other women that consider abortion a constitutional right and we should maintain control of our own bodies. If you are personally against abortion, that is your own choice and religious sentiment should not makes its way into legislature. Cutting funding of planned parenthood and other legislations should be actively opposed. 

For more information, please visit the personally frustrating article about those trying to create more antiabortion legislation: http://www.npr.org/2011/06/23/137350265/gop-hopefuls-divided-over-anti-abortion-pledge?sc=tw&cc=share 

Tweet
"These long wars will come to a responsible end."

President Obama speaking on #Afghanistan withdrawal.  Read full remarks here (via abcworldnews)

Tweet

I am not happy about this. The incessant arguments over abortion is fruitless in my opinion and should stick with Roe vs. Wade…It is the WOMAN’S CHOICE. Lawmaking officials and middle class white men should keep their noses out of this business; it does not and never will concern them. 

Tweet

anniesboobs:

iheartchaos:

Mexican and Central American drug gangs have gotten pretty big in the past several years, and for while it was common to find homemade jungle submarines. But now it appears that drug cartels have begun building tanks by armoring trucks with steel plating…

Tweet
A BASIC RUNDOWN OF THE VIOLENCE IN YEMEN
In a visual depiction of the utter chaos in Yemen, Semen’s government tried to subdue protestors and tribesmen. This picture was captured after the ceasefire. These attacks are in protest of President Saleh, who is recently recovering from 40% burns to his body after a rocket attack. His refusal to leave office has sparked debate and opposition, along with unfulfilled promises to to accept a transition plan by the Saudi-led Gulf Co-Operation Council. 
This picture can be attained at : http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/in-pictures-13626883

A BASIC RUNDOWN OF THE VIOLENCE IN YEMEN

In a visual depiction of the utter chaos in Yemen, Semen’s government tried to subdue protestors and tribesmen. This picture was captured after the ceasefire. These attacks are in protest of President Saleh, who is recently recovering from 40% burns to his body after a rocket attack. His refusal to leave office has sparked debate and opposition, along with unfulfilled promises to to accept a transition plan by the Saudi-led Gulf Co-Operation Council. 

This picture can be attained at : http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/in-pictures-13626883

Tweet
latimes:

“A senior Egyptian general told CNN Tuesday that officials performed ‘virginity checks’ on women arrested during the uprising that led to former President Hosni Mubarak’s ouster, the first time the authorities have admitted they performed such tests during the revolution,” Molly Hennessy-Fiske reports.

“The girls who were detained were not like your daughter or mine,” the general told CNN. “These were girls who had camped out in tents with male protesters in Tahrir Square, and we found in the tents Molotov cocktails and [drugs].”
The general said the virginity checks were conducted to prevent the women from claiming they had been raped in custody.
“We didn’t want them to say we had sexually assaulted or raped them, so we wanted to prove that they weren’t virgins in the first place,” the general said. “None of them were [virgins].”

Photo: Salwa Hosseini, a 20-year-old Egyptian hairdresser and one of the women named in an Amnesty International report about human rights abuses during protests that led to the downfall of former President Hosni Mubarak, described to CNN how she was subjected to a “virginity test.” Credit: CNN

latimes:

“A senior Egyptian general told CNN Tuesday that officials performed ‘virginity checks’ on women arrested during the uprising that led to former President Hosni Mubarak’s ouster, the first time the authorities have admitted they performed such tests during the revolution,” Molly Hennessy-Fiske reports.

“The girls who were detained were not like your daughter or mine,” the general told CNN. “These were girls who had camped out in tents with male protesters in Tahrir Square, and we found in the tents Molotov cocktails and [drugs].”

The general said the virginity checks were conducted to prevent the women from claiming they had been raped in custody.

“We didn’t want them to say we had sexually assaulted or raped them, so we wanted to prove that they weren’t virgins in the first place,” the general said. “None of them were [virgins].”

Photo: Salwa Hosseini, a 20-year-old Egyptian hairdresser and one of the women named in an Amnesty International report about human rights abuses during protests that led to the downfall of former President Hosni Mubarak, described to CNN how she was subjected to a “virginity test.” Credit: CNN

(Source: Los Angeles Times)

Tweet
Tweet

Rape as method of warfare and insights from Arun Ghandi

A growing concern albeit mass epidemic taking place in Libya is redefining methods of warfare that has left me nonplussed about the integrity of humanity and livid about the violent insurgency taking place. 

The problem cannot be contained as a simple matter of civil war or terrorism attacks. It leaves me to think, “How can people even fathom the notion of raping mothers and daughters, innocent women, as a form of warfare against their own people? Even of other cultures?” How has the world come to this that the thought can even take form into action? To say I am concerned about the future is an understatement. 

Forces loyal to Libyan leader, Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, were forced to rape women as part of their offensive strike for Misrata. 

In the BBC account from African correspondent, Andrew Harding, he had the opportunity to speak with young soldiers who took part in the systematic raping of four women ages 20-24. 

“They were conscious [during the rapes]. I raped one,” said one undisclosed soldier. 

“The girls said nothing. They were tired and they were in bad shape because there were 20 officers before us.” 

The soldiers claimed they were nervous and frightened, but were forced to rape these women or would risk some sort of penalty. They were also inveigled into these horrendous acts by monetary incentives, reportedly earning $8 for their “good work.” 

Why does this strike me as so much worse than the killings and mutilations? Not only is it such a violent act, and on innocent individuals, but the added psychological effects procure an attack on the mind, body, and soul. It is not only a physical act, but one that can psychologically effect and haunt an entire population. 

“I think this is a big problem - much bigger than we think. People [in Misrata] feel deep pain, and depression. This has affected us much more than anything else during the fighting,” says Dr Ismael Fortia, an obstetrician living in Misrata in the interview with Harding. 

There was a reported 50 families who endured the acts of being shot in the leg and tied up as the younger women in the families were raped upstairs by the officers. It is estimated now that hundreds have also encountered such attacks, though they have gone unreported to spare the families. 

Yet, it doesn’t end there. These soldiers apparently record the rapes on their phones and circulate them through forms of media to further humiliate the women and families and strip open the fresh wounds from recent attacks.

While the distance can separate citizens of the U.S., the horror should not escape them. 

 On Monday, May 16, Ohio University students and faculty greeted the reputable Arun Ghandi, the grandson of notable pacifist and ideological leader Mohandas Ghandi for a lesson on nonviolence in the face of adversity and racism to kick off international week. 

In his hour long speech, he talked about global poltics in today’s society, or the lack thereof. 

“Every nation has a foreign policy on what is good for them,” Ghandi said.

Ghandi pointed out that a nation cannot survive on its own, and barriers must be broken to ensure a greater communication and unity with other countries.

“We have to remember that if the rest of the world goes down the drain, we go down with them…The only way we can secure ourselves is by securing the whole world,” Ghandi said. 

This relates to Libya. It may not be in our backyard, but the disgraces to humanity that are occurring can easily affect the U.S., or other countries in the long run, and it is important that everybody recognize these problems and work towards progress and remedying these problems. 

This does not suggest U.S. military involvement, which is often the go-to among ego-centric societies that refer to themselves as the “salvation” to other countries. Although, sometimes military involvement is necessary, but it is hard to draw that line. 

The most important thing to consider is, “What led to this insurgency? Why are these rebel forces feeling the way they do?” 

Arun Ghandi spoke of the difference between passive and physical violence. If we can better recognize the beginnings of the passive violence rebels are honing, we can prevent the physical violence and atrocities to take place, not even in other countries, but in our own. The terrorist attacks of 9/11 are a prime example of this. 

One of the most important quotes I received from Ghandi’s speech was this, 

    “Anger can be used intelligently for the good of humanity,” said Ghandi. 

Though I may possess an intense anger towards these soldiers and other assaulters in sexual assaults, it does nothing to dwell on this anger. In reflecting on these occurrences and observing and recording them, one can use this anger to rectify the situations in the future and be an asset to society rather than an angry unproductive member that only fuels the fire of anger and violence. 

The BBC article can be viewed at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-13502715

Tweet

The impact of news on human emotions

It is said that humans have the capacity to distance themselves from true horror on a daily basis, otherwise the macrocosm of internecine violence and injustice would be too grandiose to deal with and remain sane. 

However, this recent news article broke down the blocked gates of my selective human emotions and settled with me, rather unpleasantly. 

In a recent article from womensviewsonnews.com, Alison Clarke reports that a British woman was recently decapitated by a man in a supermarket. 

Mother, grandmother, citizen, employee. The nefarious act set me in a tailspin of disbelief, shock, and disgust that something so impure and unjust could occur in this world. 

Without cause and without warning, witnesses observed as a man stabbed the woman, decapitated her, and then carried her head out with him while he said to himself, “God is on earth.” 

Clearly, this man was not in a sane state of mind. But not so clear is how something so horrific as this could occur. Did the witnesses watch everything happen? Did they do anything to stop the man from stabbing her, then proceeding to decapitate her? Did they attempt to detain the crazed man? So many questions run through my mind. The cliches of, “It’s not fair” and “How could this happen?” continue to take turns consuming my thoughts. 

In the article, her daughter reportedly said, “She was full of life, generous of heart, would do anything for anyone.” 

It continues to settle. My distance from reality is gone and I can’t stop thinking about this stranger, this mother and grandmother who did not deserve such a tragic end to life. 

News reels us in. Without journalism and the news industry, I would never know of this woman. I would be gazing the world from my periphery, never truly contemplating life’s events and their meanings. While I cannot gather the meaning in this woman’s death and the suspect who continues to run free after decapitating an innocent human being, it has caused me to reflect. Without news we would be narcissistic sociopaths; consumed by our own meager lives and never gauging the horrors of war and violence that cause us to realize its existence, cause us to stand up against it, or cause us to try to make meaning of it. I can feel the walls of my distanced emotions shattering, and with this, a great news story is born. 

To view this article, please visit: http://www.womensviewsonnews.org/wvon/2011/05/british-woman-beheaded-in-tenerife-has-been-identified/

Tweet

Altered historical photos remove Hillary Clinton for religious purposes

History cannot be altered. 

Unless that is, you are highly skilled in the art of photoshopping. 

According to The Jewish Week, an Ultra-Orthodox Hasidic Jewish newspaper, Der Tzitung photoshopped U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton out of a photograph documenting her, President Obama, Vice President Biden, and the U.S. National Security Team being illuminated on the recent quest for Osama bin laden. 

The reasoning behind it was that the conservative newspaper considered Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s image to be sexually explicit and suggestive in her long-sleeved suit jacket. 

Not only is this a violation of women’s rights and misrepresentation of women leaders in media, but it is also a violation of journalistic integrity. Although I understand religious beliefs may be contradictory to certain viewpoints and topics reported, it should in no way distort a photograph of historical significance. 

Furthermore, to claim Hillary Clinton’s image as “racy” or “suggestive” is completely unwarranted and does nothing more than suggest conflicting ideologies about a woman in power. 

If this photograph was regarded as  ”racy,” it should not have been included in the first place instead of manipulating it to produce inaccurate visual content. A photograph can be very powerful in a news article, and by distorting the image, the message is being distorted. Pictures play such a vital role in communicating information, and this manipulation deviates from all codes of journalistic ethics and integrity. 

According to Professor Stan Alost, Associate Professor of Visual Communications at Ohio University, “A photographs role is separate and distinct; it has a different effect.” 

This effect is usually more powerful. Even more importantly, many people who do little more than skim over words, focus intently on a news story’s photograph. Pictures are recalled more, and can communicate more effectively. 

Every reader of this newspaper article now believes differently of the actual events that occurred because of this aberration from reality. They believe Hillary Clinton was not there. How is that a product of news? Reliability and accuracy are the two main components of journalism, and this newspaper completely disregarded both. 

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton must deal with enough criticism from the masses, but to completely remove her presence on a historical event interferes with much more than feminist issues and delves into the realm of conspiracy, inaccuracy, and misrepresentation of facts into unknown fiction. 

 

To read this article, please visit:  http://www.thejewishweek.com/blogs/jewish_techs/hasidic_newspaper_photoshops_hillary_clinton_iconic_photo

Tweet

Miuccia Prada says feminism no longer exists

Controversy and protests erupt in China after Italian fashion designer and former women’s rights advocate, Miuccia Prada, was accused of discriminating a past employee on appearance. 

According to an article by Karen Whiteley on womensviewsonnews.org, Prada has been actively pursuing the Chinese retail market, but faced backlash after telling an employee to lose weight and change her hairstyle. Former retail manager, Rina Bovrisse, supported these claims after admitting her suspicions that she was terminated based on her refusal to fire over 30 employees for being unattractive or overweight. 

Members of the Association for the Advancement of Feminism protested near Tsim Sha Tsui, according to Whiteley. Chairwoman Sally Choi Wing-sze expressed concern over the prevalent discrimination and sexual harassment cases in companies in Hong Kong. As a result, Choi sent a letter to the CEO of Prada denouncing such behaviors. 

This comes shortly after Miuccia Prada told reporters that she believed feminism no longer exists. 

But I think it’s important to consider what her definition of feminism is. In my opinion, feminism remains in her mind as the narrow-minded image so many people carry with them of a bra-burning clan of radical lesbians (all myths by the way. Bra burning in fact never took place in the 1960’s; feminists actually burned pornographic magazines.)

If feminism no longer exists, then what should we call the people standing up to the discrimination and sexual harassment practice in Hong Kong? To me, that blatantly spells out feminism. 

It was important for me to spell out my definition of feminism in this post and straighten out the inaccuracies and stereotypes that have been misrepresented by ego-conscious conservative males in the past. Recently, my father read my blog posts and questioned my focus on feminism and women’s rights issues claiming it “didn’t suit me well” while cracking jokes about me joining a softball team soon. 

I am not a sensitive person, but that hurt. Feminism to me is empowerment. It is equal rights and not a request, but a DEMAND for equal opportunities that should be granted to not only women, but people of all races, all ages, and all religions. Feminism defines me and my life choices, and when someone insults this way of thinking, they insult me and my integrity. 

Activist Cheris Kramarae once stated, “Feminsim is the radical notion that women are human beings.” This is the basic principal. It does not make me a man-hating, bra-burning, radical, butch lesbian named “Pat,” it just makes me a worldly, conscious person who considers equality and equal opportunities for all essential to our infrastructure.  

It is hard for me to even put into words a simple definition, because my being and thinking is so intensely interwoven in the idea of feminism. How can it be fair that women get paid $0.77 to every male dollar? How is it fair that it took until the 1920’s for women to even be considered basic citizens of the U.S. and entitled to simple privileges like voting? How is it fair that a man can sleep around with 30 women and earn a pat on the back while women are ostracized, looked down upon, and berated as a slut? It is not fair. As a feminist, I am enraged from these injustices and work towards bringing light to these issues in order to find solutions. These thoughts are what inspired me to even create this blog. 

Not everyone is going to agree. Anti-feminism is very similar to racism in my opinion. It will always be there, and many times outsiders are unable to grasp the inferiority complex that plagues minorities. It is hard to see patriarchy and white privilege ceasing to exist in this country, and until then, critics are still going to stand on their soapboxes calling feminists bra-burners, and get nods of approval from the public. They might even get their own TV shows and call themselves legitimate experts on topics. 

Therefore, I rebuke Miuccia Prada’s affirmation. I completely disagree that feminism is gone. On the contrary, I think it is thriving in more forms than ever. Everyday I write a post on this blog, I keep feminism alive. Everyday a sexual harassment or discrimination charge sees the guilt of an oppressor, feminism stays alive. Everyday women stand up and declare themselves equal and demand the same rights as those of the opposite sex, feminism remains alive. Feminism is breathing and healthy in today’s society, and I am sure after the protests occurring in China, Miuccia Prada eats her words with a nice slice of humble pie. 

Tweet

Ethical issues considered with photos of Osama’s funeral

Osama bin laden’s death has brought up some serious ethical issues related to journalistic integrity. 

The stir over social media today was whether pictures of Osama’s funeral should be published and released to the public. The tricky and often misguided path between reporting news to the masses and offending large groups of people is a topic often neglected in everyday discussion. 

However, this is something journalists must always be aware of and consider. I specifically remember an anecdote one of my professor’s used on the topic of ethics. He was a budding reporter in a small town, and a small boy had drowned in a nearby pond. My professor arrived at the pond to report the event, and saw the father walking from the pond carrying the blue, lifeless boy in his arms. He grabbed his camera and captured the moment. 

After going back to his office to write the article, he had an important decision to face. The still shot of the heartbroken father as he carried his dead son would have been powerful on the front page of the newspaper. It also would have been morally wrong. 

In some instances, journalists should not remain truly objective. There are always unintentional biases going into articles, but emotions are also indirectly poured into every written piece. It is why criticism and fervid red pen marks all over an article you’ve written still feels like a sucker punch to the heart. 

Journalists should still consider ethics and morals when writing particularly sensitive articles. Pictures like these have no journalistic value, and are purely distributed to gain revenue, readers, and satisfy the public’s curiosity. 

Other factors must also be weighed into this particular debate, however. Do people believe Osama deserves the same rights and sensitivity as say the lifeless boy from the pond? No.

Yet, this is where objectivity does matter. While some Americans, especially those who’s families were affected and touched by the tragedy of 9/11, may receive satisfaction through these pictures, a journalist must consider other perspectives and disregard nationalist sentiments. 

When dealing with death, no matter whether the dead was a young child or serial killer, journalists should try to maintain a little dignity and adhere to a strict guideline of moral codes and ethics. 

Tweet

Sila Sihan poses for Playboy to inspire women

The first Turkish to pose for Playboy is creating quite a stir, according to The Daily Beast online. 

Sila Sahin, 25, posed for the May issue of Playboy as a message to Turkish women to embrace liberation. 

“For me, these pictures are an act of liberation from the cultural constraints of my childhood,” said Sahin in the article by Asra Nomani. 

This revolutionary act against Islam tradition has fueled debate and even caused her own family members to ostracize her. The extreme act proves to be a volatile tool in bringing attention to the traditions which have enabled women to remain subordinate in Muslim culture for centuries. 

While these customs were formed out of respect, the reinforcements in Muslim culture that claim a woman’s body as “forbidden” only allows discrimination and inequality to perpetuate. 

Captured through a magazine and distributed to the world, media once again is evoking societal changes. While this may result in further turmoil, enraged conservative arguments, and shunning from her family, there is no doubt that it is fueling discussion and making others reevaluate traditions that have remained unquestioned for in families and culture for years. 

There is no correct side to this issue. Should Turkish women be allowed the same rights as others to strip down at their choosing? Yes. Does this also counter their exact point by exploiting their bodies as a form of pornography for male pleasure? Yes. It is a slippery slope. 

I do admire Sahin’s bravery and this act will permeate culture and elicit discussion of women’s place in Muslim culture. Gender segregation and mandated clothing attire for women hinders progress, and this act tore down large concrete barriers in a big and shocking way. 

Media is a facilitator and enabler for societal changes. Through media we can report injustice, express grievances, and demand change. Sahin said to have done this as an act of inspiration to Turkish women. Same may not agree, but through the mass audience media can reach in a matter of seconds, there is no doubt that Sahin’s decision will inspire some and challenge conventions. 

Sahin expresses her purpose of posing nude in the Playboy issue,  ”I have tried to please everybody for too long. With these images I want to show young Turkish women that it is OK to live the way they are, that it is not cheap to show skin, that you should pursue your goals instead of bowing down to others.”

If you’d like to view this article from The Daily Beast visit: http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-05-01/playboys-muslim-cover-girl-does-sila-sahin-help-women/?cid=hp:beastoriginalsL3#

Fight World Hunger